Comparison
Proxy MTProto | پروکسی vs Tofan Trade | سیگنال کریپتو
A side-by-side look at two public Telegram channels — audience size, reach, engagement, growth and an audience-quality estimate, all from public data.
| Metric | @iproxy | @tofan_trade |
|---|---|---|
| Subscribers | 7.4M | 7.1M |
| Avg views | 847,319 | 116,735 |
| Engagement rate | 11.5% | 1.6% |
| 30-day growth | +0.0% | +32.8% |
| Language | فارسی | فارسی |
| Category | — | crypto |
| Channel age | 2942 days | — |
Audience quality
An estimate from public metrics — we have no admin access to Telegram’s native analytics, so treat this as a signal, not a verdict.
@iproxy
Looks reliable
- Reach and engagement sit in a normal range for this size
@tofan_trade
Mixed signals
- Engagement swings sharply between snapshots — unstable reach
We compare only what we observe from the public surface. Engagement rate is approximate (average views per subscriber) and audience quality is an estimate, not a verdict — see the methodology.