Comparison
iRo Proxy | پروکسی vs اخبارفوری خبرفوری جنگ امریکا فوری
A side-by-side look at two public Telegram channels — audience size, reach, engagement, growth and an audience-quality estimate, all from public data.
| Metric | @iroproxy | @km_ap |
|---|---|---|
| Subscribers | 7.9M | 7.5M |
| Avg views | 799,920 | 50,181 |
| Engagement rate | 10.1% | 0.7% |
| 30-day growth | +9.1% | +36.0% |
| Language | فارسی | فارسی |
| Category | — | news |
| Channel age | 2558 days | — |
Audience quality
An estimate from public metrics — we have no admin access to Telegram’s native analytics, so treat this as a signal, not a verdict.
@iroproxy
Looks reliable
- Reach and engagement sit in a normal range for this size
@km_ap
Questionable
- Views are low relative to subscribers — possibly an inactive or inflated audience
- Engagement swings sharply between snapshots — unstable reach
We compare only what we observe from the public surface. Engagement rate is approximate (average views per subscriber) and audience quality is an estimate, not a verdict — see the methodology.