Comparison
ISHBOR Toshkent vs ФИЧА
A side-by-side look at two public Telegram channels — audience size, reach, engagement, growth and an audience-quality estimate, all from public data.
| Metric | @kerak_bormi_ishlar | @silicon_kitchen |
|---|---|---|
| Subscribers | 1.3M | 1.2M |
| Avg views | 110,827 | 31,289 |
| Engagement rate | 8.3% | 2.5% |
| 30-day growth | -1.4% | +28.5% |
| Language | Русский | Русский |
| Category | — | — |
| Channel age | 1014 days | 212 days |
Audience quality
An estimate from public metrics — we have no admin access to Telegram’s native analytics, so treat this as a signal, not a verdict.
@kerak_bormi_ishlar
Looks reliable
- Reach and engagement sit in a normal range for this size
@silicon_kitchen
Looks reliable
- Reach and engagement sit in a normal range for this size
We compare only what we observe from the public surface. Engagement rate is approximate (average views per subscriber) and audience quality is an estimate, not a verdict — see the methodology.