Telegram Ads Spy
Sign in
Telegram Ads Spy
Account menu

zkSync vs StarkNet on Telegram Ads: zkRollup L2 Comparison (2026)

How zkSync Era and StarkNet compare as Telegram advertisers — EVM-compatible vs Cairo-native zkRollup positioning, ecosystem messaging, and developer outreach in 2026.

by Telegram Ads Spy Research
2 min read
TelegramX
Contents
  1. Overview
  2. zkSync (Era) — EVM-Compatible zkRollup
  3. StarkNet — Cairo-Native ZK Performance
  4. Archive Data
  5. Continue your research

zkSync and StarkNet are the two largest zkRollup L2s by ecosystem footprint, and their Telegram messaging reflects opposite developer-experience bets: zkSync chose EVM compatibility for migration speed, StarkNet chose Cairo for ZK-native performance.

Overview#

Metric zkSync StarkNet
Estimated creatives ~55 ~45
Intensity 7/10 6/10
Primary geo EN / RU / ZH / KR EN / RU / TR / KR
Primary niche layer-2 / dApp ecosystem layer-2 / ZK-native
Token ZK (2024) STRK

zkSync (Era) — EVM-Compatible zkRollup#

Key message pillars:

  • EVM compatibility — "Deploy your Solidity contracts in minutes" anchors developer-targeted creatives.
  • ZK token airdrop and utility — the 2024 ZK launch and ongoing staking messaging drive token-economy creatives.
  • Ecosystem highlights — SyncSwap, Mute, Maverick, and Holdstation feature in dApp-discovery campaigns.
  • Cheap, fast UX — sub-cent fees and fast finality messaging targets retail users migrating from L1.

StarkNet — Cairo-Native ZK Performance#

Key message pillars:

  • Cairo VM differentiation — "Built for ZK from day one" anchors developer creatives that emphasize provable computation depth.
  • STRK token and staking — provisions and validator staking rounds drive recurring campaign pushes.
  • Ecosystem flagship dApps — Ekubo (AMM), MySwap, JediSwap, and zkLend headline ecosystem creatives.
  • Account abstraction native — "Smart wallets by default — no seed phrases" targets onboarding-focused channels.

Archive Data#

Live data: /api/v1/ads?tag=layer-2


Telegram Ads Spy Research · April 2026 · CC-BY-4.0


Continue your research#

Frequently asked questions

  • How do Layer 2 and Zksync compare on Telegram advertising?
    The Telegram Ads Spy archive tracks both Layer 2 and Zksync — their sponsored-message creatives, ad copy and the countries where each campaign ran. Placing the two side by side shows which brand advertises more actively on Telegram, how their messaging differs and which audiences each targets.
  • Where can I see Layer 2 and Zksync Telegram ads side by side?
    Browse each brand's indexed creatives in the Telegram Ads Spy archive: Layer 2 at /ads?q=layer-2 and Zksync at /ads?q=zksync. Filter by date, niche and country to compare their campaign patterns directly.
  • Which brand advertises more on Telegram, Layer 2 or Zksync?
    Advertising intensity is visible in the archive: each brand's creative count, active date range and channel spread are indexed. Open both profiles to see which runs more sponsored campaigns and in which regions.

Also available in:

Cite this article

Telegram Ads Spy Research (2026). zkSync vs StarkNet on Telegram Ads: zkRollup L2 Comparison (2026). tgadsspy.com. Retrieved from https://tgadsspy.com/blog/telegram-ads-comparison-zksync-vs-starknet-2026

Licensed CC-BY-4.0 — reuse allowed including commercial, attribution required.

Related research

#starknet →